🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard him for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.